I shall not dwell into the concept of Vedas being beyond prophecies, history and geography in this analysis.
If we find mention of word “Krishna” in Mahabharat or Vedas, it does not mean, they prophesise about Lal Krishna Advani!
By that logic, Bible prophesises about all people born with name George and Islamic texts about people named Muhammad, Ali etc!
And that the word Islam was already existing way before Muhammad adapted it to name his cult.
It is welcoming that Muslims are now acknowledging that they owe their peacefulness to Vedas.
But that does not mean that Vedas prophesise those people.
It only means that those words were popular and people chose to adopt these names.But interestingly, even they talk of nothing even remotely related to Muhammad or Mecca in the alleged verses. It seems that IRF team frantically searched for various mantras referring to camel in Vedas, and chose to interpret them, as per their own agenda, as would soon be evident.Readers can review the Griffith translation of these mantras at decide themselves.Of the translators mentioned by IRF, two are western indologists who had their own Christian agenda.They can no way be considered relevant for understanding of Vedas.2.And if indeed they believe so, let them issue a world-wide fatwa to start donating cows, stop eating beef and admitting that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) killed the entire population of Mecca!